Since Compound launched “Lending as Mining” in June 2020, DeFi has become popular, and “Liquidity Mining” has been popular for nearly two years. Due to the increase in the activity volume on the chain driven by DeFi, the gas fee has been at a high level for a long time. When Curve issued governance tokens in August 2020, with a gas price of 250 GWEI, a deposit transaction in Curve required a gas fee of about 0.3 ETH. Liquidity mining not only helped the cold start of the project, but also spawned a huge bubble. The market began to redefine the valuation of the project. There are also many DeFi leaders whose prices have dropped by 90% directly from the high point.
Although there is a new round of crypto bear market, the volume of the DeFi market is a huge increase compared to 2 years ago. According to Defi Llama, as of May 31, 2022, TVL in DeFi applications was $128.65 billion, an increase of about 116 times compared to $1.1 billion on May 31, 2020 two years ago; This is a decrease of 53.7% compared to $277.98 billion on December 3, 2021. In the past two years, the top DeFi projects have established a brand moat, and at the same time, they have continued to innovate and iterate new versions to provide better products for the market.
Today, liquidity mining has become more rational. In the following, PANews will take stock of ten early DeFi projects to see what their status quo is after the tide of liquidity mining recedes.
Uniswap was originally released in November 2018, and it has consolidated its leading position through step-by-step innovation. From the very beginning, Uniswap V1 can only form a trading pair between ERC20 tokens and ETH, to Uniswap V2 can provide any ERC20 tokens. Liquidity, now Uniswap V3 can customize the liquidity range and fee ratio.
In May of this year, Uniswap’s trading volume was about $62.6 billion, an increase of about 220 times compared with $284 million in May 2020; compared with the high of $84.7 billion in May 2021, a decrease of about 26.1 %. As of May 31, 2022, current Uniswap liquidity totaled $5.97 billion, down 43.1% from the December 1, 2021 high of $10.5 billion.
The update of the V3 version further increased Uniswap’s market share to 74%. Previously, the transaction fee ratio of most DEXs was 0.3% by default, while the transaction fee ratio of centralized exchanges such as Binance was within 0.1%. Compared with centralized exchanges, DEX did not have an advantage in transaction fees. After the launch of Uniswap V3, traders can enjoy a lower handling fee ratio due to the ability to provide more concentrated liquidity near the market price, while the liquidity provider’s capital utilization rate will be improved, resulting in higher returns. . Please refer to our previous article: “Data Perspective on the Current Situation of Uniswap V3: 0.05% Fees Are Superior, Multi-Chain Development Quickly Reclaims DEX Lost Ground”.
Taking the data on June 2 as an example, among the Uniswap V3 USDC/ETH trading pair, the USDC/ETH trading pair with a handling fee of 0.05% has a liquidity lower than 0.3%, but the trading volume of the former in the past 7 days is about Liquidity providers with a tier of 0.05% can obtain higher transaction fees.
Released at the end of August 2020, Sushi is an early fork project of Uniswap, trying to seize the Uniswap market through vampire attacks without Uniswap launching a governance token. Users provide liquidity on Uniswap, and then pledge LP tokens to SushiSwap for liquidity mining. The APR of some trading pairs was once more than 1000%. After a period of time, this part of the liquidity is automatically withdrawn from Uniswap and deposited into Sushi.
After Uniswap issued coins, Sushi gradually lost its advantage. Even though Sushi has expanded to more than a dozen chains and added Kashi’s lending and Miso’s IDO functions, it still lacks core competitiveness. Personnel changes have also been a destabilizing factor affecting Sushi. In September 2020, Sushi founder Chef Nomi handed over the administrator rights; in September 2021, the anonymous leader 0xMaki also announced his official withdrawal. Defi Llama shows that Sushi’s liquidity is only $2.07 billion, down 70.6% from $7.04 billion on November 9, 2021. The trading volume of $3.93 billion in May this year was down 84.4% from the high of $25.2 billion in May last year.
Released in January 2020, Curve dominates the major stablecoin trading market. Due to the competition between Convex and similar projects and the rise of algorithmic stablecoins, “Curve War” requires relevant market participants to purchase and pledge CRV, thereby controlling the issuance of CRV and attracting more stablecoins to Curve. fluidity.
Uniswap V3 competes with Curve in the stable currency trading market through a 0.01% first-level fee, and Curve also tries to enter the cross-asset trading market through various innovations. In addition to the main stable currency exchange, Curve has also made a lot of efforts in cross-asset transactions. Curve has cooperated with Synthetix to launch a cross-asset trading function. For example, when exchanging DAI to WBTC, DAI will first be exchanged for sUSD in Curve, and then sUSD will be exchanged for sBTC through synthetic asset trading in Synthetix, and then in Curve. Convert sBTC to WBTC. As the market value of SNX is gradually decreasing, the liquidity of synthetic assets is limited, and large-value transactions are limited by the liquidity of synthetic assets such as sUSD in Curve.
Curve’s tricrypto2 pool has also accumulated more than $470 million in liquidity, with USDT, WBTC, and WETH each accounting for about one-third, and the current transaction fee ratio is 0.069%, providing a low price for the top three tokens by market value. Trading methods with low fees and low slippage.
Currently, Curve has a total of $8.93 billion in liquidity across chains, a 63.3% drop from $24.3 billion on January 5, 2022, and a roughly 700-fold increase from $12.75 million two years ago.
Bancor’s white paper was published in February 2017, and it is the inventor of liquidity pools, creating the earliest AMM DEX on the market. Beginning with Bancor V2, support provides unilateral liquidity and impermanence loss compensation.
Bancor’s original vision was to provide long-tail assets with liquidity tied to BNT, so in terms of products, Bancor is similar to Uniswap V1. Before Bancor 3, all tokens could only be paired with BNT. Today, when the utilization rate of funds is getting higher and higher and the transaction fee is getting lower and lower, this method that all transactions need to be completed through the intermediate token BNT is out of date.
In May of this year, Bancor 3 was launched, introducing a new Omnipool architecture that integrates the liquidity of all tokens into a single virtual vault, which can reduce gas costs and improve efficiency, and transactions are conducted in the best transaction path, while It is no longer necessary to pass BNT. Liquidity in Bancor is currently $620 million, down 74.4% from $2.42 billion on May 10, 2021.
Synthetix was born out of the original stablecoin project Havven, which later changed its monetary policy in February 2019. Yearn founder Andre Cronje once tweeted that “Kain and Synthetix invented liquidity mining”. Synthetix founder Kain responded that his inspiration came from Livepeer and Fcoin. At that time, there was no term “liquidity mining”, but it was called “LP reward system”.
Synthetix is a synthetic asset protocol. It mainly uses over-collateralized SNX tokens to synthesize forward or reverse encrypted assets, indices, stocks, etc. The most important thing is that the synthetic asset is the stable currency sUSD. The issuance of sUSD was 98.7 million, a 12.1x increase from the 7.53 million two years ago, and a 70% drop from the August 25, 2021 high of 329 million.
Yearn is a product of liquidity mining. It was launched in July 2020, creating a model for the fair distribution of tokens. Yearn is also a representative project of revenue aggregators. By pooling user funds, participating in liquidity mining in protocols such as Curve, and extracting a part of the performance fee from mining revenue as protocol revenue. Yearn locks a certain amount of CRV tokens, so participating users can get a higher rate of return than self-mining, and can also save gas fees for reinvestment.
Due to the entry of competitors such as Convex, and liquidity mining has gradually lost its attractiveness due to the decline in yield, the risk-free yield of DeFi composed of Curve 3pool, Aave V2 USDC deposits, and Compound USDC deposits has fallen to around 1% , Yearn’s market is gradually shrinking.
Yearn’s earnings are affected by the size of funds under management, with the current TVL of $1.19 billion, down 82.8% from its December 4, 2021 high of $6.91 billion. Yearn has been in the red since the beginning of the year because of the decline in revenue but still incurring operating expenses each month.
MakerDAO is one of the earliest DeFi projects. The stable currency launched at the beginning was single-collateralized SAI (the collateral can only be ETH). In November 2019, the current multi-collateralized stable currency DAI was launched.
After the market crash on March 12, 2020, MakerDAO aggressively expanded backed collateral. There are now 4 DAI minting methods supported in MakerDAO: over-collateralization; anchoring and stable module; real asset mortgage; direct deposit module. Among them, DAI minted through the anchoring stable module accounts for nearly half of the total amount of DAI, which provides sufficient exit liquidity for DAI and makes DAI and centralized stablecoins closer and closer.
As a stablecoin soft-pegged to $1, DAI rarely disappoints in terms of price stability, with few prolonged periods below $1. In the extreme market situation on 3.12 in 2020, there was a 10% premium. After that, more collateral was added, and the anchoring and stability module was introduced. Even if there is an extreme market situation in the future, this situation will hardly happen again.
At present, DAI is the largest decentralized stablecoin by market value, with a circulation of 6.76 billion, a decrease of 34.9% compared with the high of 10.38 billion on February 15, 2022, and an increase of about 51 times compared with 129 million two years ago.
Formerly known as EthLend, it raised funds in 2017, announced the launch of the Aave brand in 2018, and launched a forced liquidation mechanism in the second quarter of 2019, and has undergone several upgrades since then. The latest Aave V3 improves the liquidity and capital efficiency of user assets across networks. Aave V3 has been deployed on several networks such as Polygon, Fantom, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Harmony.
Today, Aave’s business is still concentrated in Aave V2 of the Ethereum main network, Avalanche, and Polygon, and Aave V3’s deposits in each network are less than $100 million. Aave V2 currently has a total deposit of $12.56 billion across various networks, a total borrowing of $3.6 billion, and a TVL of $8.96 billion. Total deposits fell 60.2% from the peak of $31.59 billion on October 26, 2021, and increased 161 times compared to two years ago.
Compound was launched in September 2018 and is also one of the earliest DeFi projects. After that, it launched a governance token in June 2020, and started the boom of “liquidity mining” through the method of “borrowing is mining”.
However, Compound lacked innovation in the follow-up development, and did not seize the opportunity of multi-chain development. Compound Chain has not been officially launched, and Aave has gradually opened the gap.
There have also been some small problems in the operation of Compound. For example, on November 26, 2020, the price of DAI on Coinbase Pro rose to $1.34, which caused the price of Compound oracle to fluctuate abnormally, causing more than $80 million in encrypted assets to be forced to liquidate . On September 30, 2021, after Proposition 62 was passed and implemented, there was a bug in the contract that resulted in the erroneous issuance of COMP tokens that should have been distributed slowly, affecting about 280,000 COMP worth $80 million at the time.
Today, Compound has about $5.62 billion in deposits, $1.29 billion in borrowings, and $4.33 billion in TVL. Although the lending market is huge, there are not many unique users. According to Dune Analytics data, in the past 30 days, Compound had an average of only 78 depositors and 24 borrowers per day. The income of the Compound protocol comes from the interest difference between deposits and loans. The more loans and the higher the interest, the higher the compound’s income. The current borrowing volume is 86.1% lower than the peak of 9.31 billion US dollars on September 6, 2021. %.
dYdX is a decentralized exchange that provides users with perpetual contracts, margin trading and lending services. dYdX was founded in July 2017, and in 2018 it launched margin trading and lending functions. In February 2021, dYdX launched a cross-margin perpetual contract product on StarkWare-based StarkEx, which is now the main product of dYdX.
Following the launch of the governance token, the implementation of liquidity mining has pushed both dYdX’s trading volume and open interest to new heights. However, as the price of the DYDX token fell, the trading volume was trending downward.
Taking the BTC/USD trading pair with a large trading volume on L2 on dYdX as an example, according to official statistics, from May 29 to June 4, 2022, the total trading volume in one week was 1.77 billion US dollars. At the high point, during the period from February 13 to February 19, 2022, the trading volume of BTC/USD was $17.27 billion, which has dropped by 89.8%.
The well-developed DeFi projects Uniswap, MakerDAO, Aave, etc., have a history of many years, and the moat brought by the brand effect enables them to maintain an advantage in the face of competition from forked projects.
Only continuous innovation can better occupy the market. For example, Uniswap and Curve have increased the core functions of transactions and further enhanced their competitiveness. Multi-chain development has become a trend to help well-known projects expand the market.
Even though the data of DeFi has fallen sharply recently, compared with two years ago, the overall TVL, Uniswap monthly transaction volume, Aave deposits and other data still have a hundred-fold increase.
Posted by:CoinYuppie，Reprinted with attribution to:https://coinyuppie.com/what-is-the-development-status-of-defi-projects-in-the-early-stage-of-the-second-anniversary-of-liquidity-mining/
Coinyuppie is an open information publishing platform, all information provided is not related to the views and positions of coinyuppie, and does not constitute any investment and financial advice. Users are expected to carefully screen and prevent risks.